Quick Options

NSFW Content:
Listing Mode:
Coloring Style:
Animations:

◀ Quick Options    Login    Register
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
posted by Farhad2000 2 weeks 2 days ago • 130 views
To improve the usability of an application it is important to have a well designed interface. Shneiderman's "Eight Golden Rules of Interface Design" are a guide to good interaction design. They are listed below, do you think VS fulfills them? the best way to make this evaluation is to log out and assume you are a new user entirely, in fact I was struck by how much different the site looked when I was not logged in. Discuss.

1 Strive for consistency.
Consistent sequences of actions should be required in similar situations; identical terminology should be used in prompts, menus, and help screens; and consistent commands should be employed throughout.

2 Enable frequent users to use shortcuts.
As the frequency of use increases, so do the user's desires to reduce the number of interactions and to increase the pace of interaction. Abbreviations, function keys, hidden commands, and macro facilities are very helpful to an expert user.

3 Offer informative feedback.
For every operator action, there should be some system feedback. For frequent and minor actions, the response can be modest, while for infrequent and major actions, the response should be more substantial.

4 Design dialog to yield closure.
Sequences of actions should be organized into groups with a beginning, middle, and end. The informative feedback at the completion of a group of actions gives the operators the satisfaction of accomplishment, a sense of relief, the signal to drop contingency plans and options from their minds, and an indication that the way is clear to prepare for the next group of actions.

5 Offer simple error handling.
As much as possible, design the system so the user cannot make a serious error. If an error is made, the system should be able to detect the error and offer simple, comprehensible mechanisms for handling the error.

6 Permit easy reversal of actions.
This feature relieves anxiety, since the user knows that errors can be undone; it thus encourages exploration of unfamiliar options. The units of reversibility may be a single action, a data entry, or a complete group of actions.

7 Support internal locus of control.
Experienced operators strongly desire the sense that they are in charge of the system and that the system responds to their actions. Design the system to make users the initiators of actions rather than the responders.

8 Reduce short-term memory load.
The limitation of human information processing in short-term memory requires that displays be kept simple, multiple page displays be consolidated, window-motion frequency be reduced, and sufficient training time be allotted for codes, mnemonics, and sequences of actions.

Comments subscribe to this feed
Yes, yes, yes!

OK, maybe no.


written by dag  | 2 weeks 1 day ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
^Something to aspire to is a good thing.


written by gwiz665  | 2 weeks 1 day ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Incidentally, these sound like good rules for human society generally.


written by NetRunner  | 2 weeks 1 day ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
My take:

1. Pretty much, yeah.
2. Hmm, not really, although campion's greasemonkey app to click on invocations is really handy. However, if we want to remove a video from a channel, it remains an incredibly involved process, e.g., *nochannel *catsanddogs *nature *comedy *timeshift *wtf *dark to remove *fear instead of just having *remove=fear. Also, having to navigate to another page to post a comment is silly.
3. I guess so, sure.
4. These are getting a bit vague, but sure.
5. This was fine until *dupeof. I still think we are better off with it than without, but there should be an easy way to undo it (I'm not saying this would be easy).
6. This is the same as #5, no?
7. A+
8. Sure.


written by nibiyabi  | 2 weeks 1 day ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
Shneiderman is one hell of a long name. I bet it anagrams well.


written by dystopianfuturetoday  | 2 weeks 1 day ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment

Connect with Facebook
          - OR -
log in or register to submit new comment


who has this post bookmarked
therealblankman  - gwiz665