
Last night the Egyptian was playing a 70mm print of 2001: A Space Odyssey, so I headed up to Hollywood with a friend to check it out. I have never seen a 70mm print of 2001, so I was really excited. Unfortunately, the print was aging poorly. It had a not-so-obvious pink glow to it and most of the reels had dirt and scratches on them. At the beginning of the screening, an announcer warned of a slight clicking that would be heard during a portion of the movie before the intermission. It was there but not distracting enough to ruin the experience for me.
Speaking of ruining the moviegoing experience, I really hate seeing movies in Los Angeles, because the audience almost always does just that. They're either talking or texting or on the phone or kicking backs of seats or something that detracts from the moviegoing experience. And, this screening was no different. Behind me, a father brought his young boy to see this Kubrick classic, and throughout almost the entire picture the little boy talked to his father, and the father never told him to be quiet. Not once. This isn't odd behavior in LA, because people out here tend to believe the theater is their living room.
Now, if you're familiar with 2001's opening, you know there's a short overture at the very beginning before the movie starts. During this overture there's only a black screen with white type that reads OVERTURE (and of course music is playing). The projectionist being a romantic for classic theatrical presentations kept the house lights up at a dim level and turned the projection lamp off so the white on black overture screen was not visible, yet we could still hear the music. This is how they used to do intermissions, as well.
Well, immediately, the annoying LA audience members who were not familiar with the movie's opening started pointing fingers at the lights and started looking back at the projectionist window as if to make aware the issue to some oblivious usher. Eventually, someone in the row directly behind me (I think it was the father of the boy) yelled, "TURN OFF THE LIGHTS AND TURN ON THE SCREEN!" As if this was as simple as hitting the power button on the remote in his living room. Suddenly, some audience member yelled back, "It's the overture, you asshole!" Half of the theater (the half who knew of the overture) whistled and clapped and roared, including me. I actually held up my hands as I clapped so the douche behind me could see how much I enjoyed seeing him taken down a notch or two.
Anyhow, I just felt like sharing. I laughed pretty hard about that for the rest of the night. And even thought it wasn't a beautiful print of 2001, it was still 2001 and it was still in 70mm! Fun times.


Stumble This




The restored HD version that is out on Blu-Ray and HD-DVD is VERY good, but of course not like seeing on the big screen.
In Kuwait it's even worse, not only do they butcher the film by cutting any kissing, sex or skin but they sometimes totally cock up the negative as a result. Die Hard 4.0, remember the daughter making out with her boyfriend? That scene was cut, but after that scene the film like increased contrast and dimmed visibly, it was a strain to watch the rest of it. Now add to that segregated seats (between guys and families, so seat selection is out of the question most of the time), annoying loud groups of kids and their dumbfuck adults. I mean really who brings their children to The Ring, Fahrenheit 9/11 or Sicko? This is why they cut movies here, because there is no rating system implemented so all movies need to be notched down to PG levels. Its so stupid because while cutting sex and stuff out they also sometimes simply shorten the movies for no reason, I remember watching Training Day as a one hour movie, furthermore they don't cut violence out, so you have 5 year olds see people get their shit blown apart (not that I personally find anything wrong with that, but its highly ironic).
I remember the last movie I watched here in the cinema was Bourne Supremacy, the whole way through these two girls were gossiping and giggling in the most annoying voice behind us. Previously some cunt would usually use a laser pointer to point out nipples of the actresses in select scenes, he thought he was a fucking comedian. Then there are people who just come to watch the movie, turn on their cellphone to play games, now you know how bright a LCD cellphone screen can be in a dark room, or worse they answer the phone and start relating the movie to their buddy (thankfully they put in cell phone blockers for this now). Other times half way through the movie, people just get up and leave making alot of noise, because they are stupid, they don't get it, they had nothing to do and thought going to the movies would be fun.
Now I only watch movies at home, alone, with a large screen and 5.1 surround sound. Its bliss compared to that shit. Watched Michael Clayton and Tropa De Elite, both great movies.
Your overture experience reminds me of Dancer in the Dark - supposedly they had to re-do the start of the film and add in visual imagery because American audiences were getting confused as to why there was sound but the 'film' hadn't started. Luckily the copy I saw here didn't have the imagery, so I was able to get swept up in Bjork's haunting music.
As you can see I'm still a bit peeved about it -- not because I was surprised that someone could allow their kid to talk during a movie, because I think that anyone who goes to the movies on a regular basis learns to become at least somewhat numb to this type of behavior -- because he's a director, and he should have known better.
But anyway, I do have to say, bad audience or not, I'm jealous that you got to see a 70mm print of 2001. I've been wanting to see that theatrically for ages. I remember in 2001 they did a limited theatrical rerelease, and I kept waiting for it to come to Toronto, but sadly it never happened. Oh well. I'll see it on the big screen one day!
So mind the spoilers kids.
Here's the ongoing "comment battle" - begins from the bottom up:
In reply to this comment by budzos:
Welcome to my growing list of shitheads. I get really absorbed in movies and so the reason I haven't seen it yet is I was waiting for the right night when I could get properly absorbed in something a little smarter. I'm busy so those times are rare. Someone with Kubrick as their avatar should have more respect for that concept. So go fuck yourself, please.
In reply to this comment by blankfist:
You're welcome. The movie has been out for six months. I'm sure you'd be upset if someone ruined the end to Citizen Kane, too.
In reply to this comment by budzos:
Thanks dickhead.
In reply to this comment by blankfist:
Can anyone explain how Clayton knew the Counsel for UNorth was behind his assassination attempt? And also that was a spoiler, just FYI.
Quite comical, actually. Right after we had this disagreement, I checked his downvote queue and noticed he downvoted one of my videos that instant: http://www.videosift.com/member/budzos/voteddown - Haha. Spiteful much?