I don't blame shortsellers • VideoSift: Online Video *Quality Control

Random

posted by jwray

7 months 3 weeks ago • 369 views

If lowering the stock price of a company can destroy it, the company was already in deep shit. They shouldn't rely on continuously issuing new stock to pay for daily operations. The only way shortselling would be a bad thing is if the shortsellers spread false rumors about the company.

comments (3)

bookmarks (0)

Stumble This

Comments

"The only way shortselling would be a bad thing is if the shortsellers spread false rumors about the company." which they do, all the time. in my opinion (and i don't know too much about it) the whole concept of shortselling is wrong.

written by paul4dirt

| 7 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

shortselling wouldn't work if stocks weren't already hyper-inflated and teetering on the verge of collapse.

Shortsellers are the lionesses weeding out the obese diseased rhinos.

written by dag

| 7 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I don't know.

I personally see no good in it.

Shortsellers are the parasites of the financial world.

If they couldn't suck the life out of something else, they wouldn't exist.

written by rougy