Featured Member Comment
Female Train Conductor Leaves Mic On - I wonder what people's reactions would have been if the conductor was male... read more by Constitutional_Patriot

Random

Science Literacy Survey
posted by jwray 4 days 22 hours 8 minutes ago • 88 views

Why was a substitute teacher fired for witchcraft? Because:

science survey

source

This ought to make every 8th grade science teacher weep.

 Our democracy is in the hands of these ignorant people!  They elect senators and congressmen who are expected to make policy on global warming, healthcare, and nuclear power.  What can people who know nothing about the issues contribute with their vote besides choosing whichever candidate is the most beautiful / the most propagandized by media?  We are in deep shit unless the education system improves.  Economic effects of education are insignificant next to education's role in democracy.

 

 

bookmarks (0)
Comments subscribe to this feed
Clearly evolution is only theoretical. Ha!


written by Farhad2000  | 4 days 21 hours 31 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Let some hillbillies fire me for witchcraft and see what would happen......I'd start a fucking coven in that town, and lure their daughters away.....

Who gives a fiddler's fuck about how we got here?? Evolution explains about 20 percent of the big picture anyhoo....the critical issue is this:
People are useful in masses, when their heads are up their asses, buried in pussy, television, and fatty foods, and wondering who is going to win what and where....We need to kill the son of a bitches keeping us in this state, if we ever want to see any REAL evolution on this motherfucker-drag then out of their high towers, kill them, their offspring, and for crissakes build a monument to the day we freed our minds-Non-linear is the only way to evolve....not in some goddamn straight line-(I haven't said fuck Obama in the ass today yet...."Fuck Obama up in his ass!")


written by choggie  | 4 days 3 hours 30 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
So the Chinese score below 50% correct for most of the questions (in some cases well below), but hit 70% on the evolution question, what's going on there?


written by Crosswords  | 1 day 19 hours 34 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
The chinese education system probably hammers that home to prevent the spread of religion. The communist party there has an interest in doing so.


written by jwray  | 1 day 16 hours 36 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
In the US and in the EU, the general majority knew the answers to almost all the answers with the exception of those that are either unproven or subject to religious opposition. In Democracy, majority rules, so our democracy is in the hands of a not completely incompetent population. In addition, these questions bare almost NO consequence on daily life and law. On top of that, I think you'll find that people who don't know shit, don't do shit, and don't vote.

Still, if you don't know the [assumed true] answer to (this), you're (this):
Question 1: A moron.
2: Brainwashed
3: Old
4: Not thinking
5: Not interested in science (normal)
6: Old (or misinformed) (in general normal, your doctor needs to know this more than you do)
7: Religious (normal) or uninformed (unfortunate) or apathetic (even more normal)
8: Religious (normal) or uninformed (unfortunate) or apathetic (even more normal)
9: Religious (normal) or uninformed (unfortunate)
10: Moron

We can't all know everything folks, even if I do. Most people probably knew a number of the questions, but not all of them. This doesn't mean that about 50% of the world is stupid, it means 50% of the questions are not common knowledge. Also don't forget this study isn't studying only college graduates. It likely covers people of most ages (if it's any good), so that means your grandma as well that uncle that's always drunk at family reunions... Remember that before you despair. Do you really expect your grandma who spent her life in social work to give a crap what an electron is or what Pangaea was?


written by Doc_M  | 1 day 6 hours 22 minutes ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
Average voters require a framework of scientific knowledge within which to guage the truthfulness of statements about economic policy, energy policy, domestic policy, etc. Otherwise they have nothing good to base such opinions on and there's a lemming effect. If average voters don't have to know science, then neither do the politicians, and if the politicians don't know science that's very bad.

For instance right now there's a big push for government subsidies of ethanol production, even though it consumes more energy than it produces. Although that could be remedied by making more efficient distilleries and halting the use of expensive fertilizers and pesticides, the subsidies encourage them to just produce as much ethanol as possible in less efficient ways.

They ought to be using leftovers from the fermentation/distillation process as fertilizer instead of buying fresh nitrate fertilizer that takes a few kilowatt-hours per pound to produce.


written by jwray  | 1 hour 55 minutes 23 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment
log in or register to submit new comment