Quick Options

NSFW Content:
Listing Mode:
Coloring Style:
Animations:

◀ Quick Options    Login    Register
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
Random

posted by jwray 8 months 1 week ago • 595 views

The Trouble is that ranking order determines the number of views, which determines the vote count, which determines the ranking order.  This is self-reinforcing, and amplifies random noise such as the number of people who were online at the time the video was submitted.  To get a more accurate ranking of videos there are some countermeasures we might try:

0.  Introduce some randomness to the default sort order

1.  Each view of a video (from a distinct user) subtracts a small fraction from its vote count

2.  Only videos found through searching or "random" mode can be voted.  If a user arrives at a video through a top-list, he cannot vote for it.  Videosift doesn't have enough traffic volume to try this approach, but YT does.

bookmarks (0)
Comments subscribe to this feed
Weighting the votes is an interesting idea, however it may seem unfair at times.


written by rottenseed  | 8 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I also like that idea, so 3 votes by top 15 members would be more likely to push to the front page when using "hot" mode than 10 votes by non-starred. Though it is kind of a "stealth vote" system.


written by dag  | 8 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
The front page and top sifts are so full of goodness, that it's easy to spend all your time there, while ignoring the unsifted. What kind of incentive could be offered to people who spend their time actively sifting fresh videos?


written by dystopianfuturetoday  | 8 months 1 week ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment

Connect with Facebook
          - OR -
log in or register to submit new comment


subscribe to this feed
Random
Blog Listing for jwray
Blog Archive for jwray
blog listing viewed 17 times

Top Sift for Nov 22nd, 2009